By Emmanuel Levinas
Emmanuel Levinas is among the most vital figures of twentieth-century philosophy. Exerting a profound effect upon such thinkers as Derrida, Lyotard, Blanchot, and Irigaray, Levinas's paintings bridges a number of significant gaps within the evolution of continental philosophy--between sleek and postmodern, phenomenology and poststructuralism, ethics and ontology. he's credited with having spurred a revitalized curiosity in ethics-based philosophy all through Europe and America.
Entre Nous (Between Us) is the fruits of Levinas's philosophy. released in France many years earlier than his dying, it gathers his most vital paintings and divulges the advance of his inspiration over approximately 40 years of devoted inquiry. in addition to numerous trenchant interviews released right here, those essays interact with problems with soreness, love, faith, tradition, justice, human rights, and criminal idea. Taken jointly, they represent a key to Levinas's principles at the moral dimensions of otherness.
Working from the phenomenological approach to Edmund Husserl and Martin Heidegger, Levinas driven past the boundaries in their framework to argue that it really is ethics, no longer ontology, that orients philosophy, and that accountability precedes reasoning. Ethics for Levinas capability accountability in terms of distinction. all through his paintings, Levinas returns to the metaphor of the face of the opposite to debate how and the place accountability enters our lives and makes philosophy important. For Levinas, ethics starts off with our head to head interplay with one other person--seeing that individual no longer as a mirrored image of one's self, nor as a chance, yet as assorted and larger than self. Levinas strikes the reader to acknowledge the results of this interplay: our abiding accountability for the opposite, and our challenge with the other's anguish and death.
Situated on the crossroads of a number of philosophical colleges and techniques, Levinas's paintings illuminates a bunch of serious concerns and has chanced on resonances between scholars and students of literature, legislations, faith, and politics. Entre Nous is instantaneously the apotheosis of his paintings and an obtainable creation to it. in spite of everything, Levinas's pressing meditations upon the face of the opposite recommend a brand new origin upon which to understand the character of excellent and evil within the tangled skein of our lives.
Read or Download Entre Nous : Thinking-of-the-Other PDF
Similar phenomenology books
In nearer, Susan Kozel attracts on concert perform, electronic applied sciences, and the philosophical technique of phenomenology. knowledgeable in dance and philosophy, Kozel locations the human physique on the heart of explorations of interactive interfaces, responsive platforms, and affective computing, asking what could be came across as we develop into in the direction of our computers—as they turn into extensions of our methods of considering, relocating, and touching.
During this centred and distinctive examine questions surrounding the act of sacrifice, Dennis King Keenan discusses either the position and the that means of sacrifice in our lives. construction on contemporary philosophical discussions at the reward and transcendence, Keenan covers new floor with this exploration of the spiritual, mental, and moral concerns that sacrifice includes.
Martin Heidegger and Michel Foucault are of crucial and influential thinkers of the 20th century. every one has spawned volumes of secondary literature and sparked fierce, polarizing debates, rather concerning the dating among philosophy and politics. And but, so far there exists virtually no paintings that offers a scientific and accomplished engagement of the 2 relating to each other.
Pierre Bourdieu's conception of perform is generally considered as one of the such a lot leading edge and illuminating end result of modern social idea. As facts mounts that the "spatial flip" within the social sciences and arts is not any mere theoretical fad, yet quite a permanent paradigm of social and cultural study, Bourdieu's prestige as a profoundly spatial philosopher takes on a renewed significance.
- Aesthetics and the Embodied Mind: Beyond Art Theory and the Cartesian Mind-Body Dichotomy
- The Logic of Intentional Objects: A Meinongian Version of Classical Logic
- The ethics of ontology : rethinking an Aristotelian legacy
- Traditional and Analytical Philosophy: Lectures on the Philosophy of Language
- Astronomy and Civilization in the New Enlightenment: Passions of the Skies (Analecta Husserliana, Volume 107)
Extra resources for Entre Nous : Thinking-of-the-Other
The totality in which a thinking being is situated is not a pure and simple addition of beings, but the addition of beings who do not make up one number with one another. This is the whole originality of society. The simultaneity of participation and non-participation is precisely an existence that moves between guilt and innocence, between ascendancy over others, betrayal of the self and return to the self. The relationship of the individual to the totality, which thought is, in which the / takes into account what is not itself and yet is not dissolved in it, assumes that the totality is manifested not as a milieu brushing against the skin, so to speak, of living being as an element in which it is immersed, but as a face in which beingfaces me.
I didn't want that"—a ridiculous excuse by which the "I," which lingers in the "inti mate society" where it was fully free, continues to exculpate itself for a wrong that is unforgivable, not because it is beyond forgiveness, but because it does not belong to the order of forgiveness. " It tortures the pious conscience only with a secondorder torture. One is cured of it, as best one can be, by charity, love of one's fellow man who knocks at the door, alms given to the pauper, philanthropy, a favorable act toward thefirstperson who comes along.
The latter cannot be a foreknowledge of the fact itself. For the thinking individual, it must consist in positing himself, on the one hand, within the totality in such a way as to be part of it—in defining himself, that is, situating himself in relation to the other parts, and deriving his identity from what distinguishes him from the other parts with which he com promises himself; but at the same time it consists in remaining out side—in not coinciding with his concept—in deriving his identity not from his place in the whole (from his character, his work, his heritage), but from himself—from being me.